Tuesday, 27 of December of 2005
It is the GPS responsible for his acts?
The systems of aid to the conduction based on location by GPS are extending at a high speed. Now that is installed in an appreciable percentage of the automobile park, they begin to arise interrogative: if our navigator GPS provides incorrect information to us and we finished lost or having an accident to follow it, the fault is ours or of the manufacturer?
In Diariomotor.com the case of the conductor of a Mercedes SLR 500, that ended in the middle of a desert and a punctured wheel, of following the instructionses that his navigator GPS gave to him. The answer that received from Mercedes was the following one:
We have to remember him to you (and its client) who system GPS does not replace to the normal maps, or in the opinion of the conductor, but is simply an improvement of trip at the disposal of the conductors, who can choose to use it or no. a conductor uses a positioning system by its account.
The two questions that become in Diariomotor seem to me very interesting:
Why some companies try to make us think that we cannot demand to the new technologies the same reliability that its classic equivalents?
Somebody that puts its SLR 500 by? desert? it is in his healthy judgment, or encouraged by a GPS or their own mother?
I fodder that all aid to the conduction is that, a aid. Him something cannot be imputed that in last instance, is decided by the conductor. But, on the other hand, if we are not going to trust the indications of navigator GPS, then not we bought why it. In the routes that or we know, it will not be to us of any aid, and in that they are new, we will have to deliver the attack to verify if the route is correct or it is taking on the other incorrect direction to us, and so we did not save anything. What opinais?
By: New features
Without commentaries still |
To print this post

















